Skip to main content

How To Read Books

J Oswald Sanders in his book 'Spiritual Leadership' gives five rules that he found made reading more meaningful and of more lasting benefit:
1. Read little that is to be immediately forgotten since that only helps to form the habit of forgetting. Exercise the same discrimination in choosing books as in choosing friends.

2. Read with a pencil and notebook in hand. Unless the memory is unusually vigorous and retentive, much reading will be a waste of time. Develop a system of note-taking, and it be astonishing to discover how great this practice aids the memory.

3. Have a "commonplace book", as it used to be a called, a book in which to put what is striking, interesting, suggestive and worthy of permanent record. One's own comments and criticism can be added. In this way an irreplaceable accumulation of material be preserved and index for use.  

4. Verify as far as possible historical, scientific and other data, and let no word slip past until its meaning is understood. 

5. Let reading be varied, because the mind so easily runs into ruts. Variety is as restful to the mind as to the body.

6. Reading should be correlated where possible - history with poetry. biography with historical novels e.g. when reading the history of the American civil war, read the biographies of Lincoln and Grant and poems written by Walt Whitman on Abraham Lincoln.
I think point 2 probably now in our digital simply means ensure you make good notes on your Kindle as you go along. And probably then export them to some electronic sharing file where your notes are properly index for reference. Similarly point 3 probably can be a form of blog, as I have here where I permanently store things I come along. 

Points 1& 4, if widely applied would help us ensure that we are thoughtful readers not just of book but what also comes through our social media feeds. There is really not much point in taking in information unless we have time to verify the information that comes away. The wisdom here is to limit what what we take in. 

Point 5 is excellent. Variety in our reading is important. This means that it is great for us to read things that we actually enjoy and are of good quality. One of the reasons we struggle to read books is that we do not think much about the quality of those books and do not vary what we read. One way to maintain variety is perhaps to come up with categories of books we like and seek to rotate among those accordingly (e.g. history, business, fiction, etc)

The only point I am sceptical about is point 6. Some people say we should read unrelated content because it pushes the brain harder to help us make connections between what we are reading. Sanders suggests we should read related stuff. I am not sure who is correct here. I will certainly give Sanders suggestion a go and see how I find the experience.
 
Copyright © Chola Mukanga 2020

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Competing Spectacles, A Review

Over the last few weeks the country has been transfixed on the amazing run of the England football team in Euro 2020. I was initially put off watching the football after I saw the team shamefully bowing to BLM at the start of each game. But as the excitement has grown in the country, I have found myself irresistibly pulled to watch a few games in the tournament. The collective national gaze over England’s Euro 2020 is an example of what Tony  Reinke, the author of Competing Spectacles , calls a spectacle.   A spectacle is something visible that captures our collective attention. It is that moment when society’s eyes and brains focus on something projected at us. This may be a big political story, a sports event, a new film or a badly behaved influencer. We primarily experience spectacles through technologies we use. I have been experiencing the spectacle of Euro 2020 through our television, but others have consumed it on the mobile or in person.  Most spectacles are consumed through ha

Are we worth saving?

In the famous film The Fifth Element , Leeloo (Milla Jovovich) poses a challenging rhetorical question to Korben Dallas (Bruce Willis) : What's the use in saving life when you see what you do with it? (Watch  here ).   She is speaking 250 years in the future, where life as we know it is threatened by the arrival of Evil. Only Leeloo (the "Fifth Element") can stop Great Evil from extinguishing life. Leeloo is the vulnerable but "supreme being" that comes as human being to save humanity. To accomplish her task she has to activate the four elemental stones of earth, wind, fire and rain, with her self in the middle as the "fifth element" that is forged into the ultimate weapon against Great Evil. It is at this point of salvation, inside the temple of stones, that Leeloo becomes disillusioned and unwilling to perform the role. She comes to realise that human beings are themselves so evil that they are not worth saving. Any “salvation” will be tempor

Jesus Never Fails

Many a times in my life, the words of this childhood hymn has been a tremendous encouragement. I pray this may encourage you too. Keep looking to Jesus! Jesus never fails, Jesus never fails The man of the world will let you down, but Jesus never fails. Your mother will let you down Your father will let you down The man of the world will let you down, but Jesus never fails. Your husband will let you down Your wife will let you down The man of the world will let you down, but Jesus never fails Your brothers will let you down Your sisters-will let you down The man of the world will let you down, but Jesus never fails Your church will let you down Your work will let you down The man of the world will let you down, but Jesus never fails Your friends will let you down Your country will let you down The man of the world will let you down, but Jesus never fails Your wealth will let you down Your health will let you down The man of the world