Skip to main content

How good is your eye sight?

During my daily travel I come across some bizarre sightings which usually sends my heart wondering. I have learned that nearly everything is telling us something about God and the nature of man.

Recently, I saw a Chinese man with his newly wed wife standing in the middle of the road in London with traffic in both directions. I know they were newlywed because the man was dressed in his suit and the woman in her bridal dressing!

Alongside the couple was the camera man. Somewhere along the way the two had decided that they wanted to remember their wedding against the backdrop of London’s historic builds and heavy traffic.

The onlookers were baffled. In fact many laughed at the spectacle. What would possess a man to drag his bride to such a photo shoot? Actually, from the energy of the bride, perhaps the question is wrongly phrased. It looked to me like the whole thing was her idea. The poor man was certainly getting some orders, and not from on high!

But amidst the puzzled faces and laughs from the staring public, I couldn’t help but wonder. We may all be laughing but that is only because we have inserted ourselves in the couple's story. When the photos are taken and shown around to family and friends we won't be there.

And what will be the relatives’ reaction to them? In all likelihood it is likely to be full of awe and amazement. They will ask, ‘how did you achieve this?’, ‘how much did it cost?’. Some will exclaim, ‘truly memorable stuff!’ The photos are likely to look spectacular and greeted with much appreciation.

The reason for the different reactions is obvious. Photos like many visual centred forms of communications lack sufficient context. They allow significant latitude to the viewer to imagine and fill in the gaps of what may be happening. Ot invites one to forge meaning for themselves. Therefore the still photograph is always giving us an incomplete picture of reality.

What is true of photography is of course true of other visual based communication. It is incomplete. We can only see partially of what we are actually seeing! As such trusting the eyes is not always the wisest thing. It turns out that “seeing is believing” but more often than not it’s a unreliable or incomplete one!

The Bible has long recognised this, when it declared “the just shall live by faith”. Apostle Paul said that all who know God in truth, “walk by faith and not by sight”. The reliable it turns out is what is unseen. No wonder the Bible says, “we fix our gaze on things that cannot be seen. For the things we see now will soon be gone, but the things we cannot see will last forever”.

We need to increasingly pray that we become people who do not take the visual as the complete reality. Let us look to God to give us a eye for unseen. This is particular important in the age of 24 hour television and Instagram!

Copyright © Chola Mukanga 2013

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Humility of Newton

Thou hast honoured me. Thou hast given me a tongue and a pen, many friends; (Thou] hast made me extensively known among thy people and I have reason to hope, useful to many by my preaching and writings... It is of thine own that I can serve thee. And if others speak well of me, I have no cause to speak or think well of myself. They see only my outward walk; to thee I appear as I am. In thy sight I am a poor, unworthy, unfaithful inconsistent creature. And I may well wonder that Thou hast not long ago taken thy word utterly out of my mouth and forbidden me to make mention of thy Name any more! JOHN NEWTON ( Source : Wise Counsel) Newton wrote these words addressed to God in his diary in 1789. In that year, Newton’s fame had grown significantly because of his publishing ‘ Thoughts upon the African Slave Trade’ and his appearance before Her Majesty’s Privy Council appointed to investigate the slave trade.  I find Newton’s words quite challenging. The words reveal a heart truly shaped by t

Pride vs Humility

Spiritual pride tends to speak of other persons’ sins with bitterness or with laughter and an air of contempt. But pure Christian humility rather tends either to be silent about these problems or to speak of them with grief and pity. Spiritual pride is very apt to suspect others, but a humble Christian is most guarded about himself. He is as suspicious of nothing in the world as he is of his own heart. The proud person is apt to find fault with other believers, that they are low in grace, and to be quick to note their deficiencies. But the humble Christian has so much to do at home and sees so much evil in his own heart and is so concerned about it that he is not apt to be very busy with other hearts. He is apt to esteem others better than himself. JONATHAN EDWARDS  (Source: The Works of Jonathan Edward’s, Volume 1)

Inconsistency of Moral Progress

If morality, if our ideas of right and wrong, are purely subjective, we should have to abandon any idea of moral progress (or regress), not only in the history of nations, but in the lifetime of each individual. The very concept of moral progress implies an external moral standard by which not only to measure that a present moral state is different from an earlier one but also to pronounce that it is "better" than the earlier one.  Without such a standard, how could one say that the moral state of a culture in which cannibalism is regarded as an abhorrent crime is any "better" than a society in which it is an acceptable culinary practice? Naturalism denies this. For instance, Yuval Harari asserts: "Hammurabi and the American Founding Fathers alike imagined a reality governed by universal and immutable principles of justice, such as equality or hierarchy. Yet the only place where such universal principles exist is in the fertile imagination of Sapiens, and in th