Skip to main content

What is your Bethel?

The house of Joseph also went up against Bethel, and the Lord was with them. And the house of Joseph scouted out Bethel. (Now the name of the city was formerly Luz.) And the spies saw a man coming out of the city, and they said to him, “Please show us the way into the city, and we will deal kindly with you.” And he showed them the way into the city. And they struck the city with the edge of the sword, but they let the man and all his family go. And the man went to the land of the Hittites and built a city and called its name Luz. That is its name to this day.
JUDGES 1:22-25 

I have been thinking about success recently. What is success? How does it look like? That is partly because of change in personal circumstances. I am now just moved into this new pastoral role, a radical departure from my previous economic role in government. The other reason is that we have been hearing a lot of success from national leaders. Prime Minister Theresa May has vowed to make a success of Brexit. What does that really mean? President Donald Trump wants to make America great again. How do we measure that?

The passage above is a helpful place to start. The context is that Joshua has died, so the people of God have come before God and asked for direction on the way forward. God has directed Judah to lead the assault and He has promised them that He will be with them as they seek full possession of Canaan. The first wave has been led by Judah and Simeon mainly focusing on the South and central parts. Now the House of Joseph is leading a new push for central and north starting at Bethel.  Bethel is a strategically town north of Jerusalem that if taken could potential open up the whole northern hill country as far as the Jezreel Valley to possible occupation by Israel. It is also spiritually important to Israel because it is Bethel, the “city of God”. Israel wants Bethel and the good news is that God is still with them.

Joseph swings into action with great military tactics. They win the battle decisively but sadly it seems to have been done though spiritual compromise. When they say to the man, “we will deal kindly with you”, literally it means, “we will demonstrate covenant loyalty with you”. This was forbidden by God and later on He will indict them for it at Bocchim.  What is interesting is that to casual reader it seems like Joseph has done nothing wrong. What is wrong with striking a deal to win war? Is this really any different from what Joshua did with Rahab?

In fact what they had done is very different from what Joshua did at Jericho. The man of Luz that the House of Joseph is helping is no Rahab. She later on became an Israelite and is one of the ancestors of Jesus. The man of Luz that the House of Joseph has let go is a diehard Canaanite! In fact instead of destroying Luz as they were supposed to do, the city has just moved to another location. Joseph’s compromise as led to a new city that now stands as a symbol of defiance against God.

Compromise always wears a friendly face. It seems so innocent and common place. Sometimes it even looks kind / tolerant”. To the world, Joseph deserves applause for achieving success! But in God’s book, the victory at Bethel represents a tragic failure because they have compromised terribly. What may look success may be a complete failure to God. It is possible to display all the marks of success as individuals, organisation or country and yet be failures in the eyes of God. Bethel is a warning to all of us not to rely on our own common sense but to look to God and to be clear what God centred success is!

Series Posts:

Who is your Simeon? (Judges 1:1-3)
What is your iron chariot? (Judges 1:19)


Copyright © Chola Mukanga 2017

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

I am what I am by Gloria Gaynor

Beverly Knight closed the opening ceremony of the Paralympics with what has been dubbed the signature tune of the Paralympics. I had no idea Ms Knight is still in the singing business. And clearly going by the raving reviews she will continue to be around. One media source says her performance was so electric that "there wasn’t a dry eye to be seen as she sang the lyrics to the song and people even watching at home felt the passion in her words" . The song was Gloria Gaynor's I am what I am . Clearly not written by Gloria Gaynor but certainly musically owned and popularized by her. It opens triumphantly: I am what I am / I am my own special creation / So come take a look / Give me the hook or the ovation / It's my world that I want to have a little pride in / My world and it's not a place I have to hide in / Life's not worth a damn till you can say I am what I am The words “I am what I am” echo over ten times in the song. A bold declaration that she ...

The Humility of Newton

Thou hast honoured me. Thou hast given me a tongue and a pen, many friends; (Thou] hast made me extensively known among thy people and I have reason to hope, useful to many by my preaching and writings... It is of thine own that I can serve thee. And if others speak well of me, I have no cause to speak or think well of myself. They see only my outward walk; to thee I appear as I am. In thy sight I am a poor, unworthy, unfaithful inconsistent creature. And I may well wonder that Thou hast not long ago taken thy word utterly out of my mouth and forbidden me to make mention of thy Name any more! JOHN NEWTON ( Source : Wise Counsel) Newton wrote these words addressed to God in his diary in 1789. In that year, Newton’s fame had grown significantly because of his publishing ‘ Thoughts upon the African Slave Trade’ and his appearance before Her Majesty’s Privy Council appointed to investigate the slave trade.  I find Newton’s words quite challenging. The words reveal a heart truly sh...

Incarnation and Modernity

[The Bible] resituate modernity's prejudices within a wider context from which they were originally wrenched, showing them to be reductive heresies of a more complex biblical reality. So whereas modernity privileges an unchanging a-historicity, in the incarnation God enters history at a particular moment to gather a people to be with him not in a Greck eternity of unchanging timelessness, but in a biblical eternity of never-ending and ever-renewed intimacy and relational richness. Whereas modernity subordinates the particular to the universal, the Bible perfectly marries the universal "image of the invisible God" together with a particular first-century Palestinian Jewish man. Whereas modernity seeks the abstract over the material and finds itself painfully akimbo between the twin idols of materialism and immaterialism, in the same gesture the incarnate Christ validates material reality and prevents his followers from ever worshipping it. Finally, whereas modernity secks ...