Skip to main content

Building Babel

I read earlier this year that work on Saudi Arabia's Kingdom Tower is expected to start later this year. It is being constructed by the same company that built London's Shard skyscraper. At the time of the announcement in February 2014, it was set to be the world's tallest with at 1 km, more than three times taller than the Shard. The owners believe it will be "a landmark building that will clearly demonstrate Saudi Arabia's ambitions to the world".


Well it turns out it may not be the tallest building. The City of Wuhan (China) is starting to build the Phoenix Towers also at the height of 1km. The project is expected to be completed in the next two years. The ambitious Phoenix Towers will be two towers themed on the traditional Chinese phoenix symbol containing two birds and representing a perfectly balanced union. The skyscrapers would feature the world's tallest kaleidoscope and vast 'planets' orbiting the towers. We have been promised "celestial restaurants" to go with it. But the Chinese are adamant that it is not their aim to go out in breaking records.


Architecture like all things reflects the tension at the heart of the human condition. There's a dichotomy between our basic, built-in understanding about the existence and nature of God and our inherent and total sinfulness that is a result of the fall of mankind in Adam.  As St Paul notes in his letter to the Roman church, this dichotomy results in darkened hearts and the suppression of truth. 

That is, we are unable to correctly perceive or represent to ourselves the true nature of the universe (including ourselves) in a way that is entirely accurate. Mankind cannot represent himself either entirely accurately or entirely inaccurately.  In the words of Grant Horner, "all storytelling-art functions as a representation of this tension inherent in man's attempts to convince himself that he is something that he is not (i.e., good), and that he is not something that he is (i.e., sinful)".  

Architecture is the prime example of this. The architecture we build communicates something about ourselves. They are not purely function. They communicate our emotions, aspiration and general outlook on life. More importantly as we shape the space around, this space in turn shapes us -  by connecting us more to the past, present, others and ourselves. 

The quest to build the tallest and most eye catching building partly reflects the fact that God has given human beings the creation mandate. We are created in the image of God and have been given a special task of not only multiplying but also to rule the earth and subdue it. Human beings are to rule over creation by living out God's creative purpose and thinking God's thoughts after Him. Architecture at its best is an expression of that mandate. Therefore there's something God honouring about it.

It is also equally true that the Bible does not end at Genesis 2. It continues to tell us about the fall of human beings and the curse of sin. We chose to eject God from his place in our hearts. Now what remains is an empty void. The pursuit of ever taller buildings is an attempt to fill that void. The question is what is the people suppose to feel or take away once they see such a building? For the Kingdom Tower it is mean to leave us in awe of the wealth of Saudi Arabia. It is meant to beckon us to worship the power of money and man. 

As for the Phoenix Towers, the designers have already made it clear they want to present the towers as a cosmos. This is ironic because all architecture are mini cosmos. They are unconscious commentary on our lives. They reflect the wishes, aspirations and experiences of life of the owner and users. We build because we are cosmic makers seeking to reorder our surroundings to create personal universes. 

The lasting impression the creators of the Phoenix Towers want to leave us seems to be that we are the centre of the universe. In other words it too is very man centred. It enthrones man as the owner of the cosmos rather than God. As the lead designer says, "Quite a lot of this project is vanity...I picked up the colour pink from the sunsets and used a lot of metaphors. We wanted to really give it some oomph.”

Copyright © Chola Mukanga 2014

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

I am what I am by Gloria Gaynor

Beverly Knight closed the opening ceremony of the Paralympics with what has been dubbed the signature tune of the Paralympics. I had no idea Ms Knight is still in the singing business. And clearly going by the raving reviews she will continue to be around. One media source says her performance was so electric that "there wasn’t a dry eye to be seen as she sang the lyrics to the song and people even watching at home felt the passion in her words" . The song was Gloria Gaynor's I am what I am . Clearly not written by Gloria Gaynor but certainly musically owned and popularized by her. It opens triumphantly: I am what I am / I am my own special creation / So come take a look / Give me the hook or the ovation / It's my world that I want to have a little pride in / My world and it's not a place I have to hide in / Life's not worth a damn till you can say I am what I am The words “I am what I am” echo over ten times in the song. A bold declaration that she

Inconsistency of Moral Progress

If morality, if our ideas of right and wrong, are purely subjective, we should have to abandon any idea of moral progress (or regress), not only in the history of nations, but in the lifetime of each individual. The very concept of moral progress implies an external moral standard by which not only to measure that a present moral state is different from an earlier one but also to pronounce that it is "better" than the earlier one.  Without such a standard, how could one say that the moral state of a culture in which cannibalism is regarded as an abhorrent crime is any "better" than a society in which it is an acceptable culinary practice? Naturalism denies this. For instance, Yuval Harari asserts: "Hammurabi and the American Founding Fathers alike imagined a reality governed by universal and immutable principles of justice, such as equality or hierarchy. Yet the only place where such universal principles exist is in the fertile imagination of Sapiens, and in th

The Shame of Worldly Joy

Only a Christian can be joyful and wise at the same time, because all other people either rejoice about things that they should be ashamed of (Philippians 3:19) or things that will disappear. A Christian is not ashamed of his joy, because he is not joyful about something shameful. That is why the Apostle Paul in [2 Corinthians 1:12] defends his joy. He says, I don’t care if everyone knows what makes me happy, because it is the ‘testimony of my conscience.’ He means, let other people can be happy about base pleasures that they are afraid to admit; let other people rejoice in riches, fame, or popularity; they can be happy about whatever they want, but my joy is different. ‘I rejoice because of my conscience.’ A Christian has a happiness that he can stand by and prove. No one else can do that. They will feel embarrassed and guilty if their happiness is found in something that is outside of themselves. They cannot say, ‘this is what makes me happy’. But a Christian has the approval of his