Skip to main content

A Confused Faith

Ed Miliband, the atheist leader of the UK's Labour Party made an interesting statement yesterday about his "faith" :
When I was twelve years old, I met a South African friend of my parents, her name was Ruth First. The image I remember is of somebody vivacious, full of life, full of laughter. And then I remember a few months later coming down to breakfast and seeing my mum in tears because Ruth First had been murdered by a letter bomb from the South African secret police. Murdered for being part of the anti-apartheid movement. Now I didn’t understand the ins and outs of it, but I was shocked. I was angry I knew that wasn’t the way the world was meant to be. I knew I had a duty to do something about it. It is this upbringing that has made me who I am. A person of faith, not a religious faith but a faith nonetheless. A faith, I believe, many religious people would recognise. So here is my faith. I believe we have a duty to leave the world a better place than we found it. I believe we cannot shrug our shoulders at injustice, and just say that’s the way the world is. And I believe that we can overcome any odds if we come together as people.
To his credit Mr Miliband's confession that he lives by faith is welcome. If only because all men live by faith, the only difference is when it is real or false. His faith lies in man of which the worship politics is one of the more overt expressions. A bit like the men who built the Tower of Babel, he declares, "we can overcome any odds if we come together as people". Eh, well not quite any odds because there's a monster in the room called "deprave human nature". But we are side tracking. The main point I want to make is that one would have thought that for a man who raises his fist against God so publicly, he would have a better grounding for his anti-God stance. In fact what we find in his statement are too many profound inconsistencies about his faith.

Mr Miliband says that when Ruth First was murdered, he was angry and "knew that wasn’t the way the world was meant to be". As a 12 year old he knew something is not quite right in the world. No one needed to tell him that. The only question is how does he explain this as an atheist? What exactly was the world meant to be from an atheistic position?  Mr Miliband is talking about purpose and design and yet he does not believe in a Designer.  Not satisfied with that inconsistency, he goes on to say that his faith is one "religious people would recognise". A faith that preaches a "duty to leave the world a better place than we found it". But who confers this duty on us, if God does not exist? All atheists agree that to have objective moral values there must be a moral law giver. Mr Miliband wants objective morality without the Giver. He makes much of injustice in Britain, but on what moral basis? When he says "we cannot shrug our shoulders at injustice, and just say that’s the way the world is", he appears to reject Darwinian naturalism! He does not think injustice is part of the evolutionary process. He believes that the quest for justice and fair play are externally given to us. There's nothing "natural" about suffering and therefore it is right and proper that we positive shape our future. We are not a mere product of chance. All of these things he seems to implicit hold onto are opposed to his atheistic beliefs. 

Since Mr Miliband asked people to know the real him. We are left with some difficult questions. Either Mr Miliband is very genuinely confused about what he thinks on these issues or he is lying to public about what he really thinks. The options do not look very attractive. 
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Pornography as Occultism

There is a kind of helplessness that a man engaged in pornography exhibits. He often speaks of it in terms of a “struggle” or an “addiction.” Now both of those terms are accurate, I believe, but they distance a person from his sin in a soul-decaying manner. Pornography is not just an addiction; it is occultism. The man who sits upstairs viewing pornography while his wife chauffeurs the kids to soccer practice is not some unusual “pervert”; he is (like his forefather Adam) seeking the mystery of the universe apart from Christ. That’s the reason the one picture, stored in his memory, of that naked woman will never be enough for him. He will never be able to be satisfied because he will never be able to get an image naked enough. I say pornography is occultism because I believe the draw toward it is more than biological (though that is strong). The satanic powers understand that “the sexually immoral person sins against his own body” (1 Cor. 6:18). They understand that the pornographic ...
Post a Comment
KEEP READING →

The Wound of Sin

Bless the Lord, O my soul, that when you were playing with the bait, unaware of the hook like so many others, He opened your eyes—allowing you to see your folly and danger so that you might flee from it. And now, be careful that you do not grasp at any of the devil's temptations, lest he ensnare you with his hook. For though you may be restored by grace, it will not be without a wound—just as a fish sometimes escapes the hook but swims away injured. That wound may bring sorrow and take long to heal. And you have already known this to be true. THOMAS BOSTON  ( Source : The Art of Man-Fishing) A sobering truth from Thomas Boston. Sin always damages. God always restores His children when we fall but it is never without the wounds. We often carry the scars of our sins. This is another m reason for us to avoid sin altogether. Sometimes in our presumption of His grace, we tend to be antinomian. Boston is warning that such an attitude is foolish since sin always damages. It always leaves ...
Post a Comment
KEEP READING →

Pussy Riot as the Messenger

I have always thought there was something uneasy, or something not quite right about Pussy Riot and the western media reaction to it. It was not just the desecration of the Orthodox Church Cathedral. I could not placed my finger on it until I read this assessment by Vadim Nikitin : How many fans of Pussy Riot’s zany “punk prayer” in the Cathedral of Christ the Savior and Nadezhda Tolokonnikova’s erudite and moving closing statement were equally thrilled by her participation, naked and heavily pregnant, in a public orgy at a Moscow museum in 2008? That performance, by the radical art group Voina (Russian for “war”), was meant to illustrate how Russians were abused by their government. Voina had previously set fire to a police car and drew obscene images on a St. Petersburg drawbridge. Stunts like that would get you arrested just about anywhere, not just in authoritarian Russia. But Pussy Riot and its comrades at Voina come as a full package: You can’t have the fun, pro-democrac...
2 comments
KEEP READING →