Skip to main content

Who is There?

Who is there? That’s the powerful question asked by one of my favourite hip-hop artists Guru from his Jazzmataz - Street Soul album in the song Who's there?. It is a question forged from a graphic description of two situations. The first verse presents a helpless young woman:
These distraught thoughts of a single mother in a homeless shelter / About pain and heartache ain't nothing you can tell her / The case worker says that she should find a job / But does this worker know what kind of jobs that there are? / Degrading things like cleaning up people's vomit / For a little bit of dough and plus your brain gets nothing from it/ I'm smarter than that this girl thinks to herself / I'm worth more than that she thinks to herself / She pours a drink for herself while she stares out the window/ This guy says he got work for her maybe she should go to him yo / The money's good and plus he'll dress her up nice / She left her baby's daddy 'cause he beat her up twice / She don't really like sex / But she hates welfare checks / And where there's money that's where she thinks there's respect / And what's this girl's purpose? /Will she self-destruct? / When this sister’s about to go down who's there to help her up?
It is certainly a bleak situation. The young woman is a single mother in a homeless shelter, who is beaten on by her non-married partner (“baby father”). She is not cared for by the system (“the case worker”). She has concluded that selling sex is more respectable than living on state support (“welfare checks”). Her situation is distraught precisely because she has exchanged one form of slavery for another. A predicament that forces Guru to ask – “who is there to help her up“? Where will rescue come from? More importantly, “what’s this girl’s purpose” in life? Does her life have any meaning at all? Does this form of poverty and despair have meaning? Is this all life is about? These themes are expanded on from a different vantage point in the next verse :
These distraught thoughts of a young man in a rooming house / This messed up life this poverty he could do without / But what options does he have when all hope is gone? / A brother gotta eat plus all the Henny and all the smoke is gone / All it takes is one quick stick / Gotta fill his belly now which vic should he pick / He does his dirt all by his lonely forget his homies / He doesn't fell like splitting any loot them suckas be acting phony / So much potential but all gone to waste / Now he lurks in night with a loaded gun on his waist / Too late for this lost soul his life's in a chokehold / Mentality is weak and doing crime is all he knows / Never caring who he hurts as long as he's taking money / Forget an education and legal ways of making money / And what's this kid's purpose? Will he self-destruct? / When a brother's about to go down who's there to help him up?
The situation here is that of a helpless young man. He has a “messed up life” which has emptied out all of his hope for the future. The result is that he now fills himself up on Hennessey and taking drugs. His god is now his belly. When it speaks to feed “now” no moral consideration enter his mind. It is a simple case of “gotta fill his belly now which [store to rob] should he pick”. It is an existence that has left him “lonely”, and lurking with “a loaded gun on his waist”. The young man has become a “lost soul”, imprisoned by his circumstances. Education and legal ways of making money are now long past. A predicament that again forces Guru to ask – “what this kid’s purpose”? Does his life have any meaning? Where is meaning in all this poverty? More importantly, where will help come from? And so he repeatedly asks at the end :
Who's there for my people on the streets? / Who's there for my people who got nothing to eat? / They build more prisons and close down schools / Who's there to teach the children the golden rules? / Who's there for my people in the streets? / Who's there for my people who got nothing to eat? / They break our family neglect the elderly / Who's there to bring a cure? Where's the remedy?
These questions of course are built on a clear truth throughout. The young man and young woman are enslaved in their circumstances! But we know that Guru does not just blame their circumstance – he has also rightly pointed to their nature. In the young woman’s predicament he notes the internal moral struggles, “She don't really like sex / But she hates welfare checks / And where there's money that's where she thinks there's respect”. In the end her human nature prevails and she sells herself for sex because she concludes money gives respect. But as Guru notes, it is “self - destruction”. In other words, it is also her doing it. In the story of the young man, he pointedly notes his “mentality is weak”. His capacity to out think his problems is not there. Again a clear truth that they cannot escape the slavery they find themselves in without outside rescue.

In the end Guru's song does not answer the question he poses because the questions are rhetorical. Man on his own cannot answer such questions. In those closing lines, we have a reminder not only that help is needed from outside, but also that other people are unlikely to help. Guru despairingly notes, “Who's there for my people who got nothing to eat? / They build more prisons and close down schools”. We live in a “dog eat dog” world. It is a fallen world where “winner takes all”. It is the very foundation of evolutionary naturalism and the Darwinian economic world view which leaves no place for morals or responsibility towards others. It therefore comes as no surprise that there’s no man-made cure. The prisons and other solutions simply point to the poverty of human effort. 

The good news is that though Guru does not know it, his questions do have an answer! The many people in distraught situations are not just another statistic. Their problems are not just their own. The truth that refuse to be suppressed no matter how hard we try is that these tragedies deep down make us sick about the world. The events remind us that something is not right about world we live in. There's something wrong when a young man decides to lurk in the dark with a loaded gun strapped to his waist. There’s something wrong when a woman sexually prostitutes herself just to earn a living. These things points to us that existence on earth is not as it should be. Our reactions point to the same reality. We are all saddened by these things because they speak to our very nature as moral creatures who recognise that this environment is not the environment we were created to inhabit.

This revulsion at the suffering of this world rightly point us to our Creator as the only who can solve them. The good news of Jesus Christ is that by God becoming man he has experienced the pain of suffering. He is not removed from them. We worship a God who is truly afflicted by the pain and suffering of this world. God is still grieved by the suffering of even those people who have rejected His Son Jesus Christ because God is always present in their suffering, especially when it is through grotesque injustice. As John Calvin rightly observed, “the cry of those who suffer injustice is the cry of God”. More importantly, God is calling all Christians to cry and weep with Him for the world. He is not satisfied with crying alone in the garden. He wants to draw us in and share His grief for the suffering young men and women of the world, the enslaved, the prostitutes, the drug dealers and countless victims. So then we can say : God is there! But are you there?


Popular posts from this blog

I am what I am by Gloria Gaynor

Beverly Knight closed the opening ceremony of the Paralympics with what has been dubbed the signature tune of the Paralympics. I had no idea Ms Knight is still in the singing business. And clearly going by the raving reviews she will continue to be around. One media source says her performance was so electric that "there wasn’t a dry eye to be seen as she sang the lyrics to the song and people even watching at home felt the passion in her words" . The song was Gloria Gaynor's I am what I am . Clearly not written by Gloria Gaynor but certainly musically owned and popularized by her. It opens triumphantly: I am what I am / I am my own special creation / So come take a look / Give me the hook or the ovation / It's my world that I want to have a little pride in / My world and it's not a place I have to hide in / Life's not worth a damn till you can say I am what I am The words “I am what I am” echo over ten times in the song. A bold declaration that she

Pornography as Occultism

There is a kind of helplessness that a man engaged in pornography exhibits. He often speaks of it in terms of a “struggle” or an “addiction.” Now both of those terms are accurate, I believe, but they distance a person from his sin in a soul-decaying manner. Pornography is not just an addiction; it is occultism. The man who sits upstairs viewing pornography while his wife chauffeurs the kids to soccer practice is not some unusual “pervert”; he is (like his forefather Adam) seeking the mystery of the universe apart from Christ. That’s the reason the one picture, stored in his memory, of that naked woman will never be enough for him. He will never be able to be satisfied because he will never be able to get an image naked enough. I say pornography is occultism because I believe the draw toward it is more than biological (though that is strong). The satanic powers understand that “the sexually immoral person sins against his own body” (1 Cor. 6:18). They understand that the pornographic

Inconsistency of Moral Progress

If morality, if our ideas of right and wrong, are purely subjective, we should have to abandon any idea of moral progress (or regress), not only in the history of nations, but in the lifetime of each individual. The very concept of moral progress implies an external moral standard by which not only to measure that a present moral state is different from an earlier one but also to pronounce that it is "better" than the earlier one.  Without such a standard, how could one say that the moral state of a culture in which cannibalism is regarded as an abhorrent crime is any "better" than a society in which it is an acceptable culinary practice? Naturalism denies this. For instance, Yuval Harari asserts: "Hammurabi and the American Founding Fathers alike imagined a reality governed by universal and immutable principles of justice, such as equality or hierarchy. Yet the only place where such universal principles exist is in the fertile imagination of Sapiens, and in th